Hello Sudip! On Sunday, September 8, 2002 at 6:20:50 PM you wrote:
> Marck, the AV test results of hackfix.org (with random trojans) seem > to suggest that AVG has rather low, 64% to be precise, detection rate. > Comparatively Kaspersky and NAV have 100 and 95 percent detection rate > respectively. AFAIR similar tests in German computer magazines the number for AVG seems right, although Kaspersky and NAV usually don't score that high - virtually no virus scanner does. that's why F-Secure uses two (three) *different* scan engines. BTW, Norton gets always highest marks for its interface and usability for newbies, but lacks behind in detection and speed. -- Dierk Haasis http://www.Write4U.de http://Interest.Write4U.de/pongo PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys The Bat 1.61 on Windows 95 4.0 1212 C Second Marriage: Another instance of the triumph of hope over experience. (Samuel Johnson) ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
