ON Tuesday, September 24, 2002, 2:31:37 PM, you wrote:

LG> Hello Gerard, 

LG> I've been using Postcast as well for the TBLH discussion list, but
LG> I've noticed it's a little on the slow side. Have you noticed that as
LG> well? I'm wondering if it's a configuration issue. It shouldn't be too
LG> slow as it's going 128Kbps on a Cable connection.

It's not the quickest when it comes to starting but it takes about 15
sec. on my 1.7Ghz/512MB machine. Also the through put is fast enough on
my 512Kps ADSL connection.

I must say I have no experience with other servers.

LG> Either way, having your own SMTP server rocks. The only thing I
LG> dislike about doing it is that your IP address shows up in the headers
LG> which isn't the greatest thing for persistent connection people.

Absolutely. I use X-Ray before Postcast to strip and add address, but I
can't stop Postcast from adding headers. Anyway since Postcast delivers
directly to the recipient I am not to worried. I don't send mail to
spammers ;-)

LG> At any rate, it really is the best way to go. You're only limited by
LG> your bandwidth, not limitations imposed by your ISP on the number of
LG> recipients (especially in the BCC field).

More control, flexibility and power. Who can refuse this?

-- 
Best regards,
 Gerard 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Double your drive space - delete Windows!


 Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3


________________________________________________
Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to