Hi Tomas, On Wednesday, September 25, 2002 20:12 your local time, (23:57 my local time), you wrote:
> Bat! is great, yet if I could choose, it would probably be 50% Bat, > 40% Poco, 10% Eudora. That is everyone's wish isn't it? :) I was also a Poco user before switching to TB!, which I still rate as second best client. Few things I did not like about Poco were it's skinned interface, limited find function (which also places, rather stupidly if you ask me, all found messages in a separate folder !!), no native support for PGP/GPG and so forth. But if I were ever to resort to some other client, rest assured it will be Pocomail. > In fact, it was because of that multiple accounts "obstacle", that I > evaluated and dropped Bat! 2 times in the past. It does seem bit odd at first, also the case with TB!'s editor, but speaking from experience, you'll soon come to think of both these features as irreplaceable. -- be well, Sudip Pokhrel | /"\ PM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign PGP Key ID: 0xD93F5185 | X Against HTML E-mail ! http://pgpkeys.mit.edu | / \ ___________________________________________________________________ Pschitt - A german drink that doesn't sound too appetizing ___________________ TB! v1.61 on XP Pro| P4-1.6Ghz 256MB RAM| ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
