Hello Jan, On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, at 10:15:54 [GMT -0400] (which was 10:15:54 AM in NY, USA) Jan Rifkinson wrote:
JS>> [...] There's simply no reason not to JS>> have this feature available. [/...] > Sure there is. > This is a different program & the > feature[s] you are talking about can be > handled differently in TB!. Ok, badly stated...there is no reason I see that this feature shouldn't be considered. Better? > If your group can't be retrained, must we > conclude that The Bat! has to be changed to > meet their requirements? Absolutely! That's what I am here for...and many others I am sure. Call it lobbying for your interests to be considered. > I don't think so. Really? I don't buy that. I've seen you raise a good many argument for and against features based upon what you feel would serve email users better. > After all, these requirements seemed to be > based on their use of an email client that > is apparently inferior & unsatisfactory [to > them] otherwise there wouldn't be any > interest in switching to TB! in the first > place. Have you ever come across an office or department you know would benefit from switching to TB only to hold that suggestion because of the "learning curve" involved. That's badly said too. TB doesn't have a steep learning curve. Rather, more popular software has a 'dumbing' effect. -- Best regards, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.stamp-co.com The Bat! v.1.62/Beta1 Windows XP build 2600 AMD Athlon 1Ghz 1.0 Gb RAM ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
