ON Wednesday, October 30, 2002, 4:07:12 PM, you wrote: JN> On Wednesday, October 30, 2002, Gerard wrote in JN> <mid:8912583454.20021030125303@;myrealbox.com>:
G>> Yes, I do have an addressbook template for this list and it does G>> this: %TO=''%TO='"%OFROMNAME JN> Gerard, JN> What is the necessity of the extra %TO in that macro? Hi Joseph, The first one clears the To: field and the second one puts on address in it. If you do not clear it first you could and up with an extra unwanted address in the TO: field. As for your other questions in the other mail: JN> 1. Will the formatting for the TO: field in the AB entry's reply JN> template override the TO: address formatting in the message on which I JN> click to "reply to this address"? Yes, I found out meself just a few minutes ago :( JN> 2. Could the reply template be in the folder to which the list mail JN> gets filtered as well as in the AB under the list's entry? Yes it could be, but you want to avoid using folder templates. They overrule AB templates and therefore will appear when you don't want them. -- Best regards, Gerard -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= The more I practice, the luckier I get. -Gary Player Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
