-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, December 12, 2002, Markus Gloede wrote...
>> GMX has proudly announced that subscribers with professional >> accounts may now also access their email via IMAP. > Well, for the people following this thread, I have new information. > Upon my query I received a reply from GMX. Here's the gist: > Some of the currently unsupported IMAP commands will become > implemented during the next weeks/months. Thus, sooner or later all > RFC-compliant mail programs should be able to use IMAP access. > Well, I don't know why there should be commands that aren't > implemented yet; does MS use a different command set? - From a rough stab in the dark, I think they're writing their own IMAP server, which would be why some implementations of commands don't exist, or don't work right. They were probably doing most of their work to make the server work with Outlook/Outlook Express which 'kindly' decides not to follow standard commands in the correct way. Although I couldn't work out why they were writing their own system as their are plenty of IMAP servers about, unless they're using complete custom software for all parts of their systems including the dial-up db, account information, and system storage, in which case it'd make a little more sense. - -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQA/AwUBPfit8yuD6BT4/R9zEQLFMACfbAUviKjlqZ1+zjCS5KdrtRm/mysAoMhz nOTqVMYGANIOi4DLuf3zNVDE =o+BB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
