Hallo Richard, On Sun, 26 Jan 2003 00:13:04 +0000GMT (26-1-03, 1:13 +0100GMT, where I live), you wrote:
>> When you view threads by references, the message that was replied >> to is _always_ one level up. RW> Now this is getting interesting because it certainly doesn't RW> happen here. I made a screendump located at: http://www.krakeel.cistron.nl/threaded_by_references.jpg to show how it looks here. Your message I'm replying to now is highlighted. Follow the tree back up, you'll find my message you replied to, and another one back up is your message I replied to. RW> In fact, on inspecting closer, the thread from your message to my RW> original goes back four messages and, even then, the message you RW> replied to is one higher in the thread. Does that make sense to RW> you? Yes. you're probably sorting in descending order, but that wouldn't really matter. And you're having unchecked: Options -> Preferences -> Message list -> Automatically adjust first column width for threaded view That would account for what you're describing. Especially the latter option might help. RW> I do have threads sorted by creation time so that might make a RW> difference and, as you are the 5th reply to that message, you are RW> 5th down the list and not one level up. Or have I misread what you RW> mean by one level? What I mean by level is this (all messages with same level have same number): 1-Blablabla | 2-Re:Blablabla | 2-Re:Blablabla | | | 3-Re:Blablabla | | | 4-Re:Blablabla | 2-Re:Blablabla | 3-Re:Blablabla Should be clear now. -- Groetjes, Roelof ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
