-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
David Calvarese [DC] wrote:
DC> On the footheels of that, how about better support for GnuPG?
That wasn't mentioned in his message. :/
What improved support are you thinking of?
- --
-= allie_M =- | List Moderator | OS: XP Pro (SP1)
_
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: My Public Keys - http://www.ac-martin.com/pgpkeys.html
iD8DBQE+aPSgV8nrYCsHF+IRAiO1AKDKSCJKHzI1fEUyGzGBa0eS4nr1OgCfWOy0
+tq2S2vJZd6wfDbgf27BI3w=
=YFrR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
________________________________________________
Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
