Hallo John, On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:13:51 -0600GMT (12-3-03, 17:13 +0100, where I live), you wrote:
RO>> Third attempt with Foxmail. This program is not quite rfc RO>> compliant. It does all kind of illegal things with the address RO>> headers. And some smtp-servers are more leniant than others. JM> How did you get it to work. I added the address for tbudl in the address book and used that for my message, when I manually entered an address, Foxmail decided that I had to be mistaken and put the address between <> behind the original. Thus creating an address like: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> which is invalid, because the characters '@' and '.' are reserved and have to be placed between quotes, so it would read: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> JM> thanks for your help. Well, actually it wasn't 'help', at least not for you. <g,d&r> It was done to disprove your statement made in: <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> that this list would filter messages from certain e-mail clients. Apart from the item that it mangled proper manually entered addresses, it's not quite the e-mail client I'd prefer. I had a few messages waiting and it didn't want to collect them. When I get back from vacation I'd like my mail client to collect the mail. TB had no problems with 23 MB of mail, even Outbreak Express didn't hesitate, but Foxmail couldn't handle it. Definitely not for e-mail professionals. That was the point that I stopped my evaluation. -- Groetjes, Roelof ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
