Hi Carsten, on Wed, 19 Mar 2003 14:10:20 +0100GMT (19.03.03, 14:10 +0100GMT here), you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
CT> * Peter Meyns writes: >> on Tue, 18 Mar 2003 18:27:30 +0100GMT (18.03.03, 18:27 +0100GMT here), >> you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : CT> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ CT> Maybe you didn't know, but this is not only a CT> Message-ID but also a valid E-Mail address. One CT> that I do read. Is it really? I know I can open a new message with it, but where would it be sent? CT> They can send me a mail and I will put them on the same list with CT> you, Thomas, Januk and Miguel. So I apologize for doing you wrong here. To me it seemed as if you just didn't care about the complaints. Sorry. :-) >> The archive properly hides e-mail addresses in headers, but >> displays everything in the body, thus making prey for spammers. CT> Januk wrote that this is not true. But look at the source code of CT> Januk's first link: CT> ,---- [ CT> | [...] CT> `---- CT> I needed 10 minutes to combine a wget, a grep and 3 seds to get a CT> beautiful list of E-Mail addresses. And I am really no expert in CT> shell scripting... I hardly have any scripting knowledge, and I believe that would go for most spammers too. So, having the address in the body hidden by the archive is certainly a good thing. CT> I don't think that Gerd needed your help in this case. As I said in my apology above, it wasn't meant on Gerd's behalf. CT> EOD, please. ACK :-) -- Cheers Peter 'Yield to temptation. It may not come your way again.' Oscar Wilde Winamp currently playing: Tori Amos - Your Cloud ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
