On Friday, June 13, 2003, 17:39:23, Peter Palmreuther wrote: >> It's the regex... > Absolutely sure??? I can't imagine how a regex that formerly took care > of a special character following 'Re' suddenly hits _any_ char after > 'Re'.
Here's what I've been using (no %SingleRe macro anywhere): %subject="Re: %setpattregexp=""(?i)\A\:?(\s*\[.*\]\s)?(\s*(re|ha|rcpt|fwd| fw|fw|aw)%- (\[\d*\])?:*)*(.*)""%RegExpBlindMatch=""%OSubj""%SubPatt=""5""" %CHARSET="iso-8859-2" > Could you nevertheless test this specific issue by removing %SingleRe > from your reply template, just to confirm or decline my theory[1], as > nobody else has done so yet? Please .... :-) For the test, I added it (I just finished replacing all my templates with something that will be easier to manage), and I can confirm that %Singlere will eat the subject... -- Jernej Simoncic, [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www2.arnes.si/~sopjsimo/ http://deepthought.ena.si/ Whenever a system becomes completely defined, some damn fool discovers something which either abolishes the system or expands it beyond recognition. -- Fourth Rule on Fools ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.62r | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
