-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Paul Cartwright, [PC] wrote:
PC> ok, if I used Spamcop filter, yes, I read the mail message, PC> determine that it is spam, CTRL-ALT-S to send AND move it to a SPAM PC> folder. This requires me reading the message, determining it is PC> spam, and dealing with it. If I use spampal( popfile..) then I check PC> mail, bring up the ticker, and see that there is already a message PC> determined to be spam in the spam folder, so I can read it later, PC> not read it, delete it, or I could also CTRL-ALT-S for spamcop, but PC> that doesn't work since it is already moved to a spam folder. Am I PC> trying to do too much? do I need spampal ( popfile) ? or do I need PC> spamcop? I wish I could get spampal to identify it, and spamcop to PC> send it, all without my having to deal with it:) Hmmm. I think you're doing too much. SpamPal will work well enough alone. It can be made to use the SpamCop blacklisted IP list anyway. Personally, I don't use SpamCop's IP list because there I get too many false positives. - -- -= allie_M =- | List Moderator _ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP SDK 3.0.2 iQA/AwUBPyVR6FfJ62ArBxfiEQK2JACg9sMDDGEyi4HTB5FFH6qIk1gwgkEAn0Ss ekHRYoCQcLKxD/MfHRZOa6P7 =NTnk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.62r | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
