Has V2 replaced the cockamamie free caret text editor with a competent auto-wrapping text editor? That would be worth upgrading for.
HTML support? The hyper-techies used to consider this a bad thing, worthy only of the admiration of someone who considers Outlook Express to be a sophisticated piece of engineering. What has changed? Does TB's HTML somehow avoid the problem of executing destructive code wrapped in HTML, and other pitfalls of email HTML? -- Stan Robins Mendota Heights, MN Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat, 1.62r www.ritlabs.com On Tuesday, September 2, 2003, at 8:35:07 AM, I received a message, mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], in which you wrote: (Text not relevant to my reply may have been snipped.) > Hello all, > Tuesday, September 2, 2003, Peter Fjelsten wrote: >> I must say that although I have been through all the betas (more or >> less) I am a bit disappointed with the features in 2.0. Like someone >> else said, if you don't use IMAP and PGP (which, I guess, most people >> don't), there is not anything "real" new. >> I will update, but that is in anticipation of more features later that >> I want (e.g. full newsgroup support), not because what is there now. >> :-( > version 2.0 has more than 70% of new code, many features were added > and many of old features were improved for better handling. TB2 core > is prepared for new features, which will be implemented soon > (completely new filtering system, customizable interface etc.). Many > features were promised for V2 platform, not for 2.0 version directly. ________________________________________________ Current version is 2.00 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
