Hi Neal, @19-Oct-2003, 19:28 -0800 (20-Oct 04:28 UK time) Neal Laugman said to Jack:
JM>> 1. Give us an easier/less time consuming/less dangerous(for JM>> klutzes like me) way of doing it. JM>> 2. Change it on *their* end. > Well, I would think this to be a VERY important issue to deal > with. Yes. By people rejecting ISPs who illegally block sending software. Make your friends aware of this. Report the ISPs concerned to RIT - they'll deal with them. This calls for education, not kow-towing to ignorance. The reason TB is blocked is explained here: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/spammer.html > After all, if something affects the basic funtionality of the > product it is serious IMO. Yes, but it's also not a fault of the product nor should a remedy be sought there. ... <snip> > ... The blacklisting of email (or any other web client software) > could have some very dark future consequences. Precisely!!! This practice should be campaigned against, not encouraged by hiding from it and thus permitting it by default. -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v2.01.2 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________ Current version is 2.01 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
