Julian Beach (Lists), [JB] wrote: JB> This is good work for the people on the list, but I am a bit JB> concerned that hacking the executable like this is probably in JB> breach of your license agreement for TB. I have not looked at the JB> license for TB, but most have a clause prohibiting such actions.
In my absence I see that there's currently a version that will, by default, no longer include an X-Mailer header in outgoing messages. Discussing this particular hack is therefore moot. However, your point about being in breach of the license is, IMO, a valid one since there *is* a clause in the license agreement that covers this. Though I, and I'm sure Ritlabs, understand the basis behind the procurement of such a hack, we shouldn't forget that it's just that, and a breach of the license agreement. -- -= allie_M =- | List Moderator PGPKeys: http://www.ac-martin.com/pgpkeys.html ____________________________________ Using TB! v2.01.7 on WinXP Pro (SP1)
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________ Current version is 2.01.3 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
