--> Tuesday, February 3, 2004, 2:30:46 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I had a malformed cut line pointed out to me and began to wonder...
tko>>> -- tko>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Malformed cut-line.. <g> > I type it manually because I dislike automated signatures. > TB removes excess whitespace from the ends of lines, so if I do not go > back and add a space there immediately before sending, this happens. > Since this seems to be of concern to many here and not other lists, > can someone tell me if this is defined by some RFC and also what > other e-mail clients take this convention into account? Wait wait wait... Umm, am I being told I need to put a cut-line on these mails without signatures? It's been vehemently regurgitated so often I thought I had to put in a cut-line and I don't even use signatures. Even the reply to this mail on the list contained the warning. So, I have attempted it from time to time, <dash><dash><space><ctrl-enter>. And now I am being told that even that is malformed. This is too dramatic. If I don't use signatures here, will I be told I need to use a cut-line? ________________________________________________ Current version is 2.02.3 CE | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
