Hello Peter! On Wednesday, April 28, 2004, 1:50 PM, you wrote:
PM> good thing, the TB! lists are up again. :-)) :) PM> However, the reply-to for TBUDL has changed, so that my filter didn't PM> catch the messages. TBTech and TBBeta seem to be unchanged. Is this PM> meant to stay this way? I had this experience, also. Being Bat-Challenged, I saw all the TBUDL messages in my In-box with some trepidation. However, I thought: nothing ventured, nothing gained. So I went to the Sorting Office and made a new rule. I left the old TBUDL rule in place. In the new rule, I copied and pasted the new Reply-To header. The three messages that have arrived subsequently (including this one) filtered perfectly. I just have to say that Marck D. Pearlstone is a good teacher, because he's the one who coached me in how to do this first, and I remembered even to go to the options tab and check "Regular Expressions" in making my second TBUDL rule. PM> The filter doesn't accept "Reply-To: The Bat! User Discussion List PM> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" when the rule says "Reply-To: PM> [EMAIL PROTECTED]" - obviously because they are different PM> strings. It would be nice, to have the filter act "logically", and PM> look for an e-mail address as a reply-to... I'm not sure I understand what you did, or rather, I guess, what you want to do. ? :) -- Best regards, Mary The Bat! 2.00.6 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 1 ________________________________________________ Current version is 2.10.01 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
