Hi Marc, on Sun, 23 May 2004 00:42:16 -0500GMT, you wrote:
PM>> gpg: Good signature from "Marc Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" PM>> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! PM>> gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs ML> to the owner. PM>> Primary key fingerprint: D0C9 5213 8892 3197 62FF 507F F92E FEDC ML> F512 0D57 ML> What's this mean? I somewhat recognise the Hex fingerprint numbers. ML> How does one do this certification? I use GnuPG and when I check your PGP signature in The Bat! this is the output. "Good signature" means that the message has not been changed after it was signed. The warning only tells me that your key has not been signed by myself or any other trusted key in my keyring. PGP calls this "Invalid". ML> My original key was generated on my OS/2 machine (still in use!) ML> with PGP 2.62i and sent to the various public key servers. Have I ML> missed something somewhere along the line? I don't think so. My GPG found your key on a server, so I could verify your sig. -- Cheers Peter If privacy is outlawed, only outlaws will have privacy. See headers for public key.
pgp701HP0Ap9n.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________ Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
