Marck D Pearlstone wrote: > Sorry for any confusion for you there Ken. I was just answering the > question asked, which was about local filters for local folders > using the local outbox and local sent message folders. Nothing to do > with IMAP there.
How do you know the question was about local filters? I didn't get that from the original post. Although upon a few more re-readings, I would probably assume he is talking about a POP account. Also (and this is just for my own knowledge), when you say "local filters" does that only apply to POP? I would interpret local filters as filters that happen client-side (POP or IMAP) as opposed to server-side (IMAP only). Am I wrong about that? > I accept that IMAP has problems and wouldn't have attempted to > answer any IMAP questions since I don't use the protocol myself :-). I just got my laptop back in commission and will be trying out betas again, but as I posted earlier, 2.10.03 has been pretty good to me - using IMAP. I know there are still problems, but 2.10.03 is a *HUGE* improvement in usability, functionality and performance for me. I must admit that I don't do anything fancy right now - too scared to ;) I'm saving the "tough stuff" for my laptop, where I can afford multiple re-installs, etc. -- Ken Green Using The Bat! v2.10.03 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 ________________________________________________ Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html