On Sunday, May 30, 2004, 8:17:07 AM, Paul Cartwright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
PC> On Saturday, May 29, 2004, 11:22 PM, you wrote: j>> ith a TB macro. It's much more time consuming that just deleting the offending j>> messages as sending an email to Spamcop is only half the process. You must also j>> wait for an email link for each spam email that you sent to Spamcop, then go to j>> their site to finish processing the isp reporting piece. I have doubts that it is j>> efficacious in reducing spam but it does "feel better" than just deleting the j>> spam! PC> you don't have to "wait" for the reply, Marck has 2 filters, one also PC> takes the reply and opens up a browser window for you with the spamcop PC> submit page open. If it "takes the reply" then you have to wait for it, no? Nevertheless, my primary point is that using Spamcop is more time consuming that simply deleting email off the server based on viewing the header (ala Mailwasher) and that (IMO) any reduction of spam due to the use of Spamcop service is probably insignificant. jon -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ________________________________________________ Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
