Hello Roelof,

On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 03:28:06 +0200 GMT (10/08/2004, 08:28 +0700 GMT),
Roelof Otten wrote:

>>> Is that on IMAP or POP?
KA>> IMAP

RO> Could the inability to to thread properly without the In-Reply-To be
RO> an IMAP issue? Any body encountering this behaviour on a POP account?

Not here. I do think it is an IMAP issue.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

Next Sunday a special collection will be taken to defray the cost of
the new carpet. All those wishing to do something on the new carpet
will come forward and do so.

Message reply created with The Bat! 2.12.02
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 2222 A 
using a Pentium P4 1.7 GHz, 256MB RAM




________________________________________________
Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to