Hallo Raymund, On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 18:07:06 +0200GMT (23-8-2004, 18:07 +0200, where I live), you wrote:
RTT> At work I saw a response from Chris and answered it from work RTT> (msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]). Now this mail contains a RTT> reference to the mail from Chris but it doesn't thread with it (at RTT> least here with 2.13beta/6 and beta/7). They thread here with beta/7 RTT> The question is why not? The threading should work in this situation as it RTT> is possible to determine the thread where the mail belongs to. For some reason your reply doesn't contain an In-Reply-To header and it's been mentioned before on this list that TB doesn't thread without In-Reply-To when you're using IMAP. TB inserts an In-Reply-To header, unless you're explicitly removing it yourself. (For whatever reason.) Apart from that your message did contain a References header, but it only contained the message-id from the message you were replying directly to. Per default TB inserts all previous message-id's in the References header. But you didn't use TB, but something called 'WWW-Mail 1.6 (Global Message Exchange)' that appears to provide broken threading headers. -- Groetjes, Roelof The Bat! 2.13 "Lucky" Beta/7 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 1 pop3 account, server on LAN Disclaimer: Any opinion stated in this message is not necessarily shared by my budgies or rabbits. ________________________________________________ Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
