Hallo Luc, On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 20:21:50 +0200GMT (23-8-2004, 20:21 +0200, where I live), you wrote:
RO>> When you don't want to redirect your mail to a different address than RO>> you're using in the From header, you don't need a Reply-To header (nor RO>> a setting for it) L> Ah but in this case i need a different reply to address: the one L> the list uses, otherwise i get replies to my address instead of to the L> list. Depends on the configuration of the list. (And on the philosophy of the list owner or the programmer of the list software) There are three types of lists 1) Those that always set the reply-to to the list 2) Those that set the reply-to to the list when there isn't a reply-to 3) Those that never set a reply-to It's a matter of thinking how ethical it is to change messages from other senders. Generally speaking 1) is totally Windows and 3) is totally Unix L> But it's strange i only have the problem with that particular list. I bet it's *nix based. -- Groetjes, Roelof The Bat! 2.13 "Lucky" Beta/7 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 1 pop3 account, server on LAN Disclaimer: Any opinion stated in this message is not necessarily shared by my budgies or rabbits. ________________________________________________ Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
