On Tuesday, August 24, 2004 it appears that Alexander S. Kunz wrote the following in regards to "BayeIT Macros":
ASK> 24-Aug-2004 19:25, you wrote: >> Spam Stats, last 24 hours (BayesIt! 0.5.11) >> Total Spam Emails: 2 >> Total Clean Emails: 186 >> BayesIT guessed right 99.5% of the time >> My email is 1.06383% spam >> Now what? ASK> Apparently, something is pretty wrong with the Bayesit stats. :-} ASK> [my opinion, the more I read about it here: BayesIt is a strange thing... ASK> apparently, it works... but do its programmers know why it works? No ASK> offense intended:-] Hi Alexander. So as advertised, I de-activated all my TB! filters even though I understand BayesIT filters are supposed to do their work before the TB! filters. So, tonight I have 376 msgs in my junk folder. I marked none of them as junk, i.e. they were all junked automatically -- presumably by BayesIT. So here are my stats Spam Stats, last 24 hours (BayesIt! 0.5.11) Total Spam Emails: 5 Total Clean Emails: 155 BayesIT guessed right 99.4% of the time My email is 3.125% spam Anyone have any ideas beyond the notion that the macros don't work. Or put it another way, has anyone found that the macros do work & represent some real numbers? TIA -- Jan Rifkinson Ridgefield CT USA TB! v2.13 "Lucky" Beta/7 W2K v5.0 Service Pack 4 ________________________________________________ Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
