Hello Roelof, On Saturday, September 4, 2004, 11:45 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: RO> On Sat, 4 Sep 2004 10:50:28 -0500GMT (4-9-2004, 17:50 +0200, where I RO> live), you wrote:
PJ>> I installed the trial version of 3.0 over my 2.12 easily... now the PJ>> filters don't seem to be working. RO> Is that as in "all of the filters" or "some of the filters"? RO> Just check the conditions to see whether something might be converted RO> badly. And spend some extra time on the filters you're suspecting from RO> misbehavior. Sorry I wasn't more clear... as far as I can tell, so far it is only the TBUDL and Spam filters that are not functioning correctly. And, strangely, some TBUDL message are filtered into their folder, some are not. The condition for the TBUDL filter is: Message Source - match - [EMAIL PROTECTED] RO> This same checking run could be used to adapt your filters to the RO> possibilities that the NFS offers. For instance, I changed my tbudl RO> filter from the condition: RO> text: Reply-To: *.tbudl@ with regexp enabled RO> to this: RO> Header Field -> Reply-To -> contains -> [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is *without* regex enabled? I will try that, thanks. BTW, I don't see where I enable or disable regex. The Options tab has what looks like fewer options too-- or does the content depend on conditions and actions previously selected? The non-working spam filter is set up like this: Message source - match - ^X-Spampal: SPAM I'll try a few alternates and see if I can get it working again. Roelof, thank you so much for your quick response. I know a lot of it is just common sense (lacking here) but I was just a little hesitant about fiddling with the NFS settings when the filters are such an important part of my system. -- Pat A Canadian in Houston Using The Bat! v3.0 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 ________________________________________________ Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
