Hello Morpheus & everyone else 12-Okt-2004 21:17, you wrote:
>> And you are absolutely, positively sure that. within one hour, your >> grasped the workings of regular expressions? I stand rapt in awe. :-) > I would not presume to be so arrogant to intimate that I had a thorough > knowledge of REGEX in such a short time however I have some dealings with > it some time ago and with another filter program but decided to in > another direction. I did not want to say that I understood your statement as being arrogant, don't get me wrong - it just sounded somewhat naive, but as I know your background now, its ok. :) > It is not the entries that are the problem it is the software that is > removing all other entries not made by itself or so it seems to me. > Has anyone else tried to do the same task? You are talking about the Bayes Filter plugin. The author is reading here AFAIK, your message may have slipped his attention though, thus I took the freedom to add to your subject line, I hope you don't mind. Either way, with a Bayes filter (I don't know how familiar you are with the idea/concept) I for one see little need of enhancing it with RegEx (other than for the sheer joy of it, and speaking just for myself, I find RegEx does not exactly give joy to me) - if you train it, it will reach high spam recognition rates without requiring much user intervenance. -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) using v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP Pro Service Pack 2 without smilies :-P From the moment I picked your book up until I laid it down I was convulsed with laughter. Someday I intend reading it. -- Groucho Marx ________________________________________________ Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
