With all these discussion about PGP, I wanted to give a try I hope the PGP will work
-- The Final Cut [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thebat: 3.0.2.1 BayesIt! 0.7.3 -----Original Message----- From: Mica Mijatovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 12:41:58 +0200 To: Paul Cartwright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Pgp Software > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > Was Fri, 24 Sep 2004, at 14:01:28 -0400, > when Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: MM>>> Anyway and whatever could happen, a "longer" means "more time", as I MM>>> understand these cracking technics. (-: "More time" - good, positive. MM>>> "Fast" - bad, negative. >> this is true. But really, what is it I am protecting, and how bad do i >> want to protect it? There aren't that many passwords that i have that >> are really that important to me, who would really want them?? >> and if they got them, could they hurt me?? probably no, most of the >> time. especially with PGP and an encrypted message! I don't use it much, >> but if things get sensitive, I can always use it! > I agree, particularly with the first sentence. > As for the last one, there are opinions that is best to sign/encrypt ALL > your mail, since if you do that only with the "sensitive" ones, then > it's easier for a snooper to direct his/her dirty intentions. > But, while signing is always possible, encrypting is not, since you > would have to have then your correspondents able to use some PGP/GPG > software. > Also is handy to put y|our public key info somewhere in a corner of your > mail, so that if someone would want to send you an "enveloped"/encrypted > message, it would be possible. > Now, this indeed has gone to OT area. --- 8< -------------------------------------
pgpKikCO2yxjR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________ Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
