Hi Bill, Tuesday, October 26, 2004, 12:50:27 PM, you wrote:
BM> I have now read the thread and am confused by your comment in BM> <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: PN>> I have checked "continue processing" despite the fact that this PN>> filter is the last in my list of filters. I don't have any "common PN>> filters." The results are the same. BM> Whether or not you checked "continue processing," the fact that your BM> "New Rule" filter is the last filter AND it performs no action means BM> that your filters should not perform any differently whether "New BM> Rule" is present or not. It appears to make no sense that deleting BM> solved any problem. Let me see if I can clarify because I think the two filters are being confused (no doubt because of my sloppy writing in the message you cite). The filter I created and asked for help with was "Yahoo! Groups Notification" (YGN, for short). There was another filter however, "New Rule" (NR, for short), that I didn't discover until later. YGN was the last filter in the list, and NR was farther up the list where I couldn't see it until I started from the top and scanned downward. In the passage you quote from me I was referring to the fact that I had checked "continue processing" in YGN, not in NR. At Allie's suggestion I moved YGN to the top of the list and when I did that, it moved my message as it should have. That caused me to look for another filter in my list that might have been operating on the message before it got to my YGN filter, which incidentally your suggestion to test the filter should have also alerted me to do. I found NR and after I deleted it (NR) other filters, not yet mentioned but which were also below NR, moved a couple of messages that were still in my Inbox. Does that clear up the sequence? -- Regards, Perry Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 ________________________________________________ Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
