Dear Roman, @30-Oct-2004, 15:19 -0400 (30-Oct 20:19 UK time) Roman Katzer [RK] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
>> Please include a signature delimiter in your messages. [...] RK> Well, as has happened to me once, he simply didn't have a RK> signature and such, no delimiter is required. Incorrect. This list *requires* a signature delimiter, supplied by the user. It's a rule. Please do NOT argue with moderations and list rules .. particularly not on list. RK> (I'm not counting putting your name under the message as a RK> sgnature) Well, I am. So are the other moderators. So are the list rules. I accept that you don't think that we're right. But we are. RK> Maybe a sig delimiter would make more sense in the server-added RK> comment. Nope. Doesn't work. Just how dumb do you really think we are? Please think it through. How about the vast majority of us that *do* have sig delimiters? Do you know what TB does when it sees two of them? One for the user's sig and one for the list footer? No? I thought not. It ignores the first and only obeys the last. That means that nearly all signatures get left on replies while only list footers are trimmed. Totally unacceptable. Please think twice before arguing with a moderation. There's *always* a good, well researched and thought through reason for such rules and postings. Thank you. -- Cheers -- //.arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator and fellow end user TB! v3.0.2.3 Rush on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2 '
pgpyweL0yrpH3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________ Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
