Dear Lou, @21-Nov-2004, 06:38 -0500 (21-Nov 11:38 UK time) Lou [L] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>>>>�yes, I'm top posting... and I will not stop. Sorry. Pease trim quotes - this has, and always had, no relevance. >>>�Have a look at Pocomail. ... <snip> >>�I registered Becky before I started using TB! but I cannot see >>�myself going back. I have tried each new version but TB! is the >>�only on L> Thanks. I have been using TB! for several years, somewhere around L> 2.0. I have always wandered back myself. If TB! would handle L> filters consistently, I would not look elsewhere. Well, I have hundreds of filters all of which do exactly what I ask of them. Many of them work on multiple levels and are complex. L> Alas, I now see that 3.0 has not have fixed the failures. I recommend that you look at this differently. L> I use popfile and it flags the mail properly and a re-filter works L> properly but it misses too often on the first pass. Then there is something amiss with the filter you have created and not the system running it. You could paste the filter here or in TBTech for our advice. There's nothing wrong with TB's astonishingly good filter system - especially in V3. There are things in the filter system that can catch you out. Particularly in filter ordering. If you have an earlier filter in the system that operates on the messages then your popfile filter won't be given the opportunity to work. -- Cheers -- //.arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator and fellow end user TB! v3.0.2.7 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2 '
pgpC2mNpYXnJX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________ Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
