Hi
On Friday 17 December 2004 at 6:02:11 AM, Bill McQuillan wrote: > However, just about everyone agrees that any other notations > (like: Re(2):, 2Re:, Ant:, or many others) should NEVER be used > since email programs cannot be expected to figure out all of the > "clever" things that programmers like to put in. Note that an > email program needs to find and ignore any such prefix in order > to search and sort Subjects or to create its own reply Subjects. I find reply numbering useful /as long as I happen to be corresponding with somebody whose email client does it in the same way/. ;-) And "Re[5]: Subject" is *so* much more elegant than "Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Subject", or even "Re: Re[2]: ..." -- Best regards, MFPA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 ________________________________________________ Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
