Hallo Barry, On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 08:48:47 +0000GMT (2-2-2005, 9:48 +0100, where I live), you wrote:
B> I have to say I'm not impressed. Just how long does it take these B> programs to work out what is and isn't SPAM? I've been using Bayes B> Filter now for approx 4 weeks, marking all messages that come in which B> are and aren't spam, but it just doesn't seem to get any better. I B> would say it misses approx 50% of the spam that comes into my mailbox. The first time I tried both BayesIt and BayesFilter, they didn't do much for me. (Apart from getting TB stuck by BayesIt) But somewhere in January I tried the latest BayesIt (available as separate download at the Ritlabs site) and today it caught all of my incoming spam (to be honest, I don't have any outgoing spam). I don't have as much spam as you do, but that's supposed to make it more difficult for these programs. Neither of them gave me ever a false positive and I consider that very important. So when the original BayesIt doesn't do it for you, try the latest. -- Groetjes, Roelof Hi, I'm a tagline. When I grow up I'm gonna be a novel! The Bat! 3.0.2.10 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN
pgpwVH5FlImXW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________ Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
