On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 13:16:45 +0100, Dick H wrote: > Hello Barry, > > On Monday, February 21, 2005 at 09:01:40 GMT +0000 (which was 10:01:40 > where I live), Barry wrote and made these valuable points on the > subject of "More observation on Bayesit!": > >> Hi > >> Well I'm still persevering! > >> I've now transcribed 83 different regex rules over to Bayesit. I extracted >> them from my copy of MailWasher. > > Why all these problems and hassle if Spambayes can do all the work for you > with just a little bit of training?
Hi Dick, I can use Mailwasher Pro VERY successfully. I'm just trying to find an integrated solution that works. So far it hasn't, but I like the challenge. :-) And there's no doubt that for me the RegEx filters have improved performance greatly. I've no doubt that SpamBayes works very well, but it's yet another program that has to be run alongside the multitude of other 'utilities' that seem to clog up my taskbar on a regular basis. So I'll give Bayesit a month and if it doesn't work after that I'll go back to Mailwasher Pro, which does. -- Best regards Barry barryh'at'kentra'dot'co'dot'uk Using TheBat! version 3.0.1.33 and BayesIt! 0.8.0 Release ________________________________________________ Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
