Hello MFPA, On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 02:21:26 +0000 GMT (03/03/2005, 09:21 +0700 GMT), MFPA wrote:
>> it really is a shortcoming of MicroEd, which cannot display UTF. >> So it's not really a TB bug. M> Is MicroEd not part of TB!? Since it is integrated the answer must be: Yes. You are right, then. >> For the user that is transparent, but I understand the >> programmers too. For me it is an annoyance and not a bug, but >> I'm not religious about the terminology. I too would like to >> display UTF in the PTV. M> Select Reply | View | Original Text and the original text window M> uses the PTV. (Perhaps depending on your settings) It uses the PTV, but it loses the UTF-encoding. TB's editor is not capable of creating UTF-encoded messages. So MicroEd is used, but not UTF. That's why it displays fine when replying. It also means that MicroEd is able to translate from UTF into supported encodings, and basically, this is all we ask for the Viewer as well. M> You might wish to support this one I submitted previously:- M> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4067 I added a bugnote. -- Cheers, Thomas. When nobody is looking, Power Users pretend their mouse is a toy car, and race it around the desk. Message reply created with The Bat! 3.0.2.10 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600Service Pack 2 ________________________________________________ Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
