Miguel A. Urech @ 2005-Apr-21 8:39:32 PM
"Difference between threaded by subject and reference" <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>> How has it been implemented? What don't you like? Perhaps it can be
>> changed before it is released if a better solution is provided.

> I explained all of this in a long message in the TBBeta list on
> 22-March-2005. If you are interested, you can look in the TBBeta
> archives for Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with
> Subject "Some thoughts about Threading, manual re-threading, etc."

This can be found at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/tbbeta@thebat.dutaint.com/msg59050.html

This thread is veering into beta territory, but I hope it still remains
pertinent.

From what I have read, your concerns are very real one; ones that I am
sure other users would have. I fully agree that there should be some
way to thread only by references.

You complaints about re-threading not being preserved is also valid.
However, Ritlabs has a semi-strict policy of not modifying messages
after they have been received. Perhaps a secondary "delta message
base" is needed that can store changes, like manual re-threading or
modifications to other headers like the date or the subject.

-- 
Chris
Quoting when replying to this message is good for your karma.

Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Accessing a POP3 mailbox.

To define recursion, we must first define recursion.

Attachment: pgpXBKV5gXFrH.pgp
Description: PGP signature

________________________________________________
Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to