Friday, May 13, 2005, 10:51:10 PM, Marck wrote:

AJ>> Surely, unless one has a large number of folders to filter out to,
AJ>> then any of those target folders is also going to be relatively
AJ>> high traffic?

MDP> No folder is as "high traffic" as the inbox. None. every incoming
MDP> message pauses in the Inbox before moving to a filtered destination.

Fair enough, but this is still a relative measure.

MDP> Keeping important messages in the Inbox is suicide. That's a
MDP> substantiated fact. Messages are being added to and deleted from the
MDP> folder continually. You think NT or 9x are stable enough to guarantee
MDP> no glitches when data is being moved that frequently? I don't!

To be honest, I don't think I have ever had an issue with Windows
failing to write a file in the manner the application instructed.  The
only occasion where I have actually (apparently) destroyed data was TB!
killing off a portion of one of my inboxes!  I don't think it fair to
blame this on Windows when there is an equal (perhaps greater) chance
that TB! was to blame (and yes I know this point supports your original
advice).

AJ>> And while we're here - define "high traffic".

MDP> Adding and deleting every time messages are received, wherever they
MDP> end up. That do for you?

Again, a relative measure. And any email client must do this. Surely it
would be fundamental to any such software to ensure that this function
works correctly if no other.

AJ>> Anyone care to enlighten me?

MDP> I think I have. This is fundamental advice. I've seen too many
MDP> "Waaah!! TB ate my inbox and all my data is gone!" type posts to make
MDP> this advice anything other than firm and serious. And it's not because
MDP> TB is bad or wrong here. It's that the OS is still not stable enough
MDP> to guarantee no faults. It's that new AV solutions become ever more
MDP> Draconian in their treatment of files they deem "infected". It's that
MDP> lightening strikes can still cause a power fluctuation just as a write
MDP> operation is going on. Let's not invite catastrophe.

On this basis, you ought not to be using Windows at all.  I recommend
RISC OS.  It's so niche that no malware author would bother and it runs
rings around Windows for useability.  Running it on a laptop could be
problematic though (to avoid those power spikes).

I just checked.  My oldest email account has 4 years of emails in the
inbox.  It's only 549 and another 657 in (Known), but that must be a
decent number of writes.

5,838 emails across 9 email accounts (plus who knows how many that have
been deleted). 1 problem, ever - which was sorted out by recourse to a
backup.

-- 
Cheers,
 Allister
:flag-newzealand:
New Zealand / Aotearoa


________________________________________________
Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to