Hallo Clive, On Tue, 17 May 2005 07:07:26 +0100GMT (17-5-2005, 8:07 +0200, where I live), you wrote:
>> Yes, in Mulberry CT> I'm not convinced about that at this stage, Roelof. Tony has posted a CT> number of messages testing his IMAP accounts in TBBETA using Mulberry that CT> have failed to thread properly while other people using the prog have not CT> had problems. I've switched from TB to Mulberry to post this - let's have a CT> look at the headers when it appears on the list. So your headers are fine. Nevertheless, Tony's aren't. And since his headers were fine with TB, it's unlikely that he has a third party tool running that 'fixes' his headers. All leads to the conclusion that it's Tony's Mulberry. Whether it is a setting or a faulty program file, it clearly is a bug when a program headers specially for threading, but makes them in such a way that they don't work, because they're not following the proper RFC. It's a rotten discussion trick, but I really think this is off topic for tbudl or tbbeta, since it concerns a different mail client and the flow is heavy enough as it is. So I'm crossposting this to tbot and replies on tbudl will invoke my moderator's wrath. ;-) -- Groetjes, Roelof I can resist everything except temptation. The Bat! 3.5 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN
pgpBf5KdXRn2s.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________ Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
