Dear Tony, @19-May-2005, 12:41 Tony Boom [TB] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
TB> How odd, you gave the impression you used it all the time for allowing TB> certain addresses through that were wrongly classified as spam? Isn't that TB> why you wanted a [TAG] in the subject line, to make it easier for you to TB> enter those addresses into your spamcop whitelist? >> So I'm backing down from this convo. TB> Not my mistake after all then :) pssst - wrong person! I was replying to myself, correcting my faulty research. It is Steve Lee who uses the Spamcop mail filtering, not me! So ... sorry ... your mistake it remains ;-) -- Cheers -- //.arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator and fellow end user TB! v3.5 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2 '
pgp4kc50erywj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________ Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
