Hi Tony, On 4/6/2005 3:04 PM +0100, you wrote: > The Bat! isn't even remotely close to being one tenth of a percent as > good as Mulberry is when it comes to IMAP. And I can't see it even > getting close to being in the same league for many years. There's far > too many other things they have fix first.
I tend to agree here. Mulberry and FastMail have certainly opened my eyes to other possibilities. It will take some time for TB! to be up to speed. It will not be long before it works well enough on high bandwidth connections. However, it will take a long time indeed, to work well on slower connections. I'll definitely be along for the ride in TB!'s development. I'll see how things pan out because these developers can be really smart and all too often implement functionality better than one would have expected. However, just to give a hint to RIT of my vision: I look forward to going to work on Monday, firing up Mulberry which starts with the mailbox caches *empty*. I click on my TBBETA folder and in about 2-3 seconds, I'm reading unseen messages *in threaded view*. Note that TBBETA contains over 8000 messages too. :) I hope to be able to do the same with TB! one of these days. I can then go back to using MicroEd, those templates and all the goodies anywhere I do e-mail. :D -- Allie Martin System specs: http://www.ac-martin.com/sysspecs.htm -=-=- Procrastination means never having to say you're sorry. ________________________________________________ Current version is 3.5.0.17 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
