-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Goos,
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:23:00 +0200 (9:23 AM here), Goos [G] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: KC>> Periodically I retry BayesIt and Bayes Filter, as a plug-in would KC>> be simpler. I always go back to SpamPal as it catches almost KC>> everything where the other two don't even come close. G> K9 running here. Gets almost all SPAM. - From the messages posted here, both recently and in the past, I think its safe to conclude that 3rd party relay type solutions seem to offer better performance than the plug-ins. For those with a spam problem, its probably worth the inconvenience of running a relay. - -- Kevin Coates Dewitt, NY USA Using TB! v3.5.24 under Windows XP 5.1.2600 SP2 ________________________________________________________________ (see kludges for my pgp key) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFCqZzgvZSrVDqOXK0RAsJFAKC9MkgOk5BZSOc0kQWcBvnqFO5UUgCfYEHi IsLCYrUL6QgKRe0L+ItaG/A= =JRR2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ________________________________________________ Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
