Hello Jan,

On Sunday, June 12, 2005 at 19:52:08 GMT -0400 (which was 1:52:08
where I live), Jan Rifkinson wrote and made these valuable points on
the subject of "spamalot":

> On Saturday, June 11, 2005 it appears that Dick Hoogendoorn
> wrote the following in regards to "spamalot":

DH>> [snip] you need to train this
DH>> program by moving a Spam message from the Ham List to the Spam
DH>> List... [/snip]

> Hi Dick. Doesn't identifying email as ham or spam do this essentially
> or is there some other means of doing this that is better?

> TIA

Jan, as far as I know that is the only thing you need to do..but there is also 
a white and blacklist option. Note that this program is based upon Spambayes 
and I just reported a db corruption...the same as was also reported for 
Spambayes 1.1a1....thought that these guys would have taken the 1.04 kernel of 
Spambayes rather than the 1.1a1 which is still in alpha. Because of this db 
corruption, I went back to Spambayes 1.04 which I've told them.

What I really miss in this SpamExpert program is a training function like there 
is in almost all anti-spam tools...well..could be because it's still a version 
1.0 and RC status...I think they still have a long way to go.

-- 
Best regards,
 Dick

___________________________________________________________
There are few problems that can�t be solved with high explosives.

Using The Bat! v3.5.25 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600 Service Pack 2

Privacy is your right...only if you defend it: 
http://www.metropipe.net/landing.cgi?id=cloggy


________________________________________________
Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
  • Re[2]: spamalot Dick Hoogendoorn

Reply via email to