Hallo St, On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 15:22:56 +0200GMT (17-6-2005, 15:22 +0200, where I live), you wrote:
SMN> I've seen several occurences of "for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" or "for [EMAIL PROTECTED]" SMN> in messages where [EMAIL PROTECTED] was in BCC. I believe BCC means noone else SMN> than the recipient get to sees those personal "Received:" header lines The Received: headers contain the address of the intended recipient. But they don't when the message has multiple recipients, as an example, you write a message to Marck and you BCC it to Leif and me, as the three of us live under different ISP's, your ISP will send it to three different servers. When we check the received headers, we'll find that the Received: header inserted by your provider has no destination included, whereas the receiving servers did include the recipient. Now you send your next message to Marck, but this time you BCC his wife. As this message will be sent as one message (Marck and his wife hanging under the same domain) until it reaches Silverstones, no recipient will be mentioned in the Received: headers. So the omission of your address in the Received: headers gives you some information about not being the only recipient. -- Groetjes, Roelof Newsbytes - Microsoft announce EDLIN for Windows. The Bat! 3.5.26 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 accounts, server on LAN
pgpSzS0sQQKLn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________ Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
