Hello Mark Partous,
Friday, June 24, 2005, 9:49:54 PM, you wrote:
MP> Hello qe3ee,
MP> Friday, June 24, 2005, 7:44:08 PM, you wrote:
q>> I fear I have to start all over again train that @"#%3!Ϥ filter again...
q>> Is there a shortcut getting back on track?
MP> FWIW, since a couple of days 100% all Spam is captured.
MP> K9 did a good job before, but there was a type of spam that it couldn't
MP> catch. I was able to capture ± 50% of that sort of mails by a combination of
MP> rules.
MP> It was because I wasn't able to catch the other 50% of what K9 missed, that
I
MP> installed SpamAnihilator. While trying it out, I saw that in the headers
MP> of those mails there was a line I didn't recognize. It was not added at the
MP> ending of the headers but at (almost) the beginning of the header-part.
MP> Turned out it was a header added by Tiscali:
MP> X-Brightmail: Suspected Spam
MP> I added a rule and since, no spam has made it trough the combination.
MP> Perhaps not a solution for you, but, what if you discovered your provider is
MP> adding such a header too? :-)
This is added by one listserver. Excerpt from a neglected mail:
X-Rc-Spam: 2005-03-31_01
X-Rc-Virus: 2005-02-17_01
X-Rc-Spam: 2005-03-31_01
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63-lists.debian.org_2005_05_20_02
(2004-01-11) on murphy.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_70,BODY_8BITS
autolearn=no version=2.63-lists.debian.org_2005_05_20_02
X-Spam-Level: **
Excerpt from another:
X-Lycos-AS: 38.00
X-Lycos-AV: OK
-Is this what I should try to pre-program my spamfilter to neglect?
--
Best Regards,
qe3ee mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
E fructu arbor cognoscitur
if this mail has a virus please throw it away and notify me :)
________________________________________________
Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
