Dear Tom, @8-Sep-2005, 22:39 -0700 (09-Sep 06:39 UK time) Tom Plunket [TP] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
TP> I have added the cut marks because this mailing list's moderators TP> have decided that they are important, and the list software's TP> automatically-appended signatures do not follow the moderators own TP> rules. However, I do wish to point out that it's a tad silly. What's silly is not thinking things through. How many years has this list been running? Here's the facts: o If there are two cut marks in a message, only the last is used. o Most members have signatures that already include cut marks o If we added a cut mark to the list footers, we would render useless all previous cut marks in messages. p So we don't. Because it's wrong to. And we ask members to. It's in the list rules. o It never pays to argue with a moderator. :gdr: -- Cheers -- //.arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator and fellow end user TB! v3.61.03 beta on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2 '
pgpNxMWJ9PD6p.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________ Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html