Hi On Thursday 27 October 2005 at 12:17:16 PM, in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, MAU wrote:
> The 'To' column, if wide enough, displays the name/address(es) of the > To: field *plus* the name(s)/address(es) of the Cc: field if there are > any. It does not show that they are "cc:" and not "to:". Also (at least in messages in my outbox) it lists "bcc:" addresses as if they were "to:", too. I could see logic for the to: column to say "[EMAIL PROTECTED] (cc:[EMAIL PROTECTED], bcc:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"(only including the "bcc:[EMAIL PROTECTED]" if that was your address or if you are looking at your outbox)... > This, adding the Cc names, is what I have come to the conclusion > that should not be that way, for three reasons: > A.- I doubt that most TB users are aware of it. Certainly, I was not aware of it. > B.- I doubt that most users, if aware, will need and make the To column > wide enough to see more than one name/address or so. Generally, I suspect screens are too narrow. In my folder for this list, due to long threads I see only the "subject" column. (In others I see more.) > C.- To me, this is the most important. It is misleading when using the > 'Alt+click' filtering on the To column. > Don't you think this issue may be at least misleading and/or annoying? > I thought about submitting a feature request to change the To column to > show/display _only_ the To field, but I'd like to hear some comment from > you first. Certainly I would not expect the contents of the "CC:" header to influence the results when filtering on "To:". But then, should 'Alt+click' filtering on the "To:" column for a message that is to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" also find a message that is additionally addressed to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"? I think it should. I definitely agree it should find a message that had addresses in the "cc:" field. -- Best regards, MFPA Lack of money is no obstacle. Lack of an idea is an obstacle. Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 ________________________________________________ Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
