Hello MAU, On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:15:19 +0100 GMT (15/12/2005, 17:15 +0700 GMT), MAU wrote:
M> 7.- A VF is not a solution for the so called 'average users' who may not M> well understand what VFs are, specially at first, and specially for M> novice ones who are initially annoyed because they can't find the Drafts M> folder everyone expects at first. One remark on number 7 of your "Two notes": There are written standards (like the RFCs) and there are de-facto standards. The latter belong to the category "what everyone expects". I agree that a draft folder is such a de-facto standard. That MS-products also have it doesn't mean it's necessarily bad; products from other vendors have it as well, and that's because it makes sense. Especially for the newbie who switches to TB from another email client. I'm not a newbie and I have accustomed to TB's way of working, but I see your point. So, no supporting bugnote from me as I personally don't care, but a confirmation that it is expected, and the functions (like PGP-relevance) are not fulfilled by parking the message in the Outbox, and editability is not available when creating a Drafts folder by yourself (but I think that messages in all folders should be editable, but that's another issue). -- Cheers, Thomas. How long a minute is depends on what side of the bathroom door you're on. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 3.63.06 (Beta) under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 ________________________________________________ Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
