Hello Andre Wichartz & everyone else, on 26-Dez-2005 at 12:53 you (Andre Wichartz) wrote:
> Two of the really really bad bugs affect tagging of messages found to be > spam: One is adding the header to the body area of a message, the > workaround beeing to have tb! search the whole message and not just the > header area, slowing the filtering process down. I've created a custom header field "X-Text-Classification" in TB and have the filter in TB look if that very header contains the word "spam". This works reliably ever since I started using K9 (I switched to K9 from PopFile, which uses the same X-Text-Classification header). > For the second there is no workaround cause to some messages K9 doesn't > add the header at all. Odd. I've never had that problem. The only thing I've noticed is that K9 seems to stumble over "newer" headers like the very lengthy domainkeys - it did not affect my spam filtering however; the messages are just incorrectly displayed in K9's list of recent messages. -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) Freedom is not an essential and basic condition for the growth of science; the care and diligence of government authorities are the most important conditions for this development. -- Vasili N. Tatishchev ________________________________________________ Current version is 3.64.01 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
