Hello David, On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 10:30:19 -0600 GMT (19/01/2006, 23:30 +0700 GMT), David Huber wrote:
DH> I changed nothing - the errors just started happening. That's what they always say. And the vase started to swing left and right by itself, until it fell on the floor and broke. I didn't do it, I swear. (My apologies. SCNR, as they say.) DH> And I'm running WinME (ARGHH!!!!). I find that quite brave. DH> Though for some reason, today, I'm not getting any of these errors DH> and it seems to have self-corrected. These self-correcting ones are the worst to track down. DH> The error message came up in a little window and all it said was DH> "Error: Unable to insert a line" with an "okay" button to click. This error message doesn't mean much, without knowing where that line was attempted to be inserted. DH> I wonder if one of the emails on my server could have been causing DH> a problem? Yes, there was a version which made TB crash when the RFC-headers of an incoming mail were faulty in a certain way. Which TB version are you using? DH> It would have gotten deleted this morning in the daily purge of DH> emails (which I leave on the server for a day after I download). DH> Or maybe not. Yes, that could be it. DH> Thanks for answering! Not sure if this line of questioning is DH> worth pursuing any more unless that message comes back. If you experience the same again, let us know. Maybe you have a possibility to forward this mail before deleting it, so we can dissect the headers. I haven't had this problem for a fewe versions now, though. -- Cheers, Thomas. Die Pille fuer den Mann wurde bei 2 000 Maennern getestet. Und tatsaechlich - keiner von ihnen bekam ein Kind! http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 3.70.06 "Qigong" (Beta) under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 ________________________________________________ Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
