Hallo John,

On Wed, 3 May 2006 06:40:46 +1000GMT (2-5-2006, 22:40 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:

>> Also if one of your filters does not have continue processing
>> checked it will not proceed to the next filter.
JP> Should all filters have this option selected?

Definitely not.
Among all (100+)of my filters there's no more than one or two that
have this option enabled.

A message will be compared against the first filter, if it matches
it'll be processed and it won't be compared against the next filter
(unless the first filter has 'continue processing...' enabled)
If it doesn't match, it'll be compared to the next filter and on and
on and on, until it finds a match (without 'continue processing...'
enabled) or until it runs out of filters.
Basically this means that, as filtering takes time and processor
power, you should put your busiest filters on top, because that means
that you won't waste processor time on comparing lots of messages
against filters that won't be triggered anyway.
Should you enable 'continue processing....' for all filters you're
losing whatever you gained with an efficient filter order.

When you look into my sorting office, the first filter you'll see is
my the one that acts upon the spam header inserted by my mail server,
next you see some filters regarding some heavy duty mailing lists. The
first eight filters process more than 95% of my incoming mail. I don't
gain anything by comparing all that mail against my other 100+
filters.

What complicates this story are subfilters. When a filter is
triggered by a message, the subfilters will be compared against that
message, when the filter doesn't get triggered, the subfilters will
be left alone.

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

Uh, yeah...I MEANT to do that!

The Bat! 3.80.03
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server on LAN
OTFE enabled
P4 3GHz
2 GB RAM

Attachment: pgpk4a93meLEW.pgp
Description: PGP signature

________________________________________________
Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to