Alexander S. Kunz @ 2006-7-16 2:12:07 PM "Lists that don't overwrite the Reply-To header" <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The deficiency is at the lists administrator of such a list: a > discussion list should replace the reply-to header with the list > address, an announcement list should keep it as-is. This is one of those "holy wars" (like plain-text vs. HTML, C vs. LISP, emacs vs. vi, etc.) that tend to crop up in the computer field. There are good reasons for both ways of doing it, so asking the list administrator to change one way or the other isn't really a discussion I want to have. Arguments for and against can be found here: http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/listreplyto.html Reply to all seems a decent solution, except the author of the message to which I am replying gets to copies: a personal one and a group message. What I'd really like is a reply to group feature that only sends the message to the group, not to the group and the sender. That way, I have all three options. The solution I'm using for now is the right click on the list address and select "Reply to this address." It works okay and invokes the correct templates. I considered using a folder template, but I've been burned by them before... -- Chris Using The Bat! v3.80.06 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2. Accessing a POP3 mailbox. There's an old proverb that says just about whatever you want it to.
pgpHejOynIRJZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________ Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
